In the race to the 2016 election for President of the United States, two major stories have been brewing as of late:
1- Conservatives disowned Donald Trump because of his most recent misogynist commentary.
2- Joe Biden is contemplating a presidential run, in no small part because his late son reportedly encouraged him to do so. (How convenient that his son’s wishes became public!)
I would like to say categorically that both news stories are a load of BS. Let’s review, shall we?
Mr. Trump is no newcomer to the world of misogyny. The GOP knew about him before he was allowed on stage at last Thursday’s debate. I could be kind of cynical and claim that they’re turning their backs on him now because it makes them look good in the face of Democratic assertions that they’re pursuing a “war on women.”
Fortunately for you, I’m more cynical than that. Right now, Hillary Clinton is widely assumed to be the eventual Democratic nominee. And then there’s Mr. Trump who claimed at the first debate that his financial contributions to Mrs. Clinton have allowed him to call her when he likes and get whatever he wants from her. If I’m the GOP, I want Trump around as long as possible but not as part of my organization. It used to be the case that a third-party run by Trump would have cannibalized the campaign of any Republican candidate in 2016. Now, however, keeping Trump relevant means the GOP nominee would have a very simple way of painting Mrs. Clinton as being under total sway of the wealthiest Americans. Just play that debate video over and over as a political commercial and the Republican nominee most likely wins.
(Un)fortunately, Mr. Trump isn’t smart enough to realize that he undid his “leverage” over the GOP with that comment. On the other hand, he might get his leverage back by eventually making comments about Hillary Clinton’s vagina. Since Bill Clinton always seemed to be interested in every vagina other than his wife’s, comments by Trump might finally succeed in making her likeable.
Scary thought, huh?
Of course, Mrs. Clinton is not a sure thing to win the nomination. DJ Gaffemaster Biden may defeat her. Or maybe he won’t have to.
Let me ask you all a question: does anyone other than the Clintons seriously believe that the NSA has been keeping surveillance on all Americans EXCEPT Hillary Clinton?
Here’s a second question: does anyone seriously believe that the Commander-in-Chief hasn’t contacted the NSA (part of the Department of Defense) to find out about all of the security issues that are presently being debated?
If Hillary Clinton did something that would make her unelectable, Obama and Biden are two of the only people who would know about it already. The House investigation of Clinton is probably just political theater that’s trying to get information publicly that they already have. And Biden’s preparations are probably a political necessity whether he likes it or not. A credible candidate on the Democratic side (and Biden is credible in spite of everything) keeps the looniest of the loonies from winning a presidential election by default. Sorry, Mr. Cruz.
Moral of the story: you don’t get the real story. You only get the narrative that covers up whatever information cannot be released to the public at the present time. Even if my speculations about Trump and Clinton are wrong, it’s still the case that all sorts of backstage shenanigans are more consequential than anything you “learn about” on the news.
Stop being a gullible sap.